I have over thirty years experience working in national security and emergency management. My research interests include geopolitics, domestic politics, criminology and law. I am a HDR (PhD) candidate at FedUni examining the Australian Government response to national security issues from 2001 - 2014
This page showcases previous papers with commentary of emerging events available at www.facebook.com/scholaratlarge.
For public policy consultancy email firstname.lastname@example.org
Saturday, 1 December 2018
The Abbott Government response to Islamic State and Ebola: a moral panic?
The Abbott Government response to
Islamic State and Ebola: a moral panic?
Australian and New Zealand
Society of Criminology 2018 Conference December 2018
It is a long tradition of the
Hobbesian realist view of politics that the most important duty of a government
is the ‘protection of their citizens’. Since 2001 a dominant mantra in
Australian federal politics has been protection of the community from ‘threats
to national security’. However, is the response proportionate and necessary to
the risk posed or is it a moral panic?
During 2014 two global events
emerged which were potential threats to international peace and security: the
rise of the Islamic State in the Middle East and the Ebola pandemic in East
Africa. Both would see an international military coalition assembled in
response. Australia would become the second largest contributor to the former
and belatedly subcontract a response in the latter.
Based upon the theory of moral
panics and the nationalism perspectives of imagined communities and ethnic
moralizers this research explores the manner in which the Abbott Government
(2013-2015) portrayed these issues. A discourse analysis model adapted from James
Gee’s ‘Discourse analysis toolkit’ is utalised.It is suggested that despite there being a
significant threat, some of the characteristics of a moral panic eventuated.
The importance of this research
rests in the almost universal agreement of terrorism scholars that one of the
aims of terrorism is to cause a government to overreact and hence undermine its
legitimacy. Descending into a moral panic based policy response would achieve
such an aim resulting in ‘policy blowback’ consequently weakening rather than
strengthening national security.
(2008, 4 October) ‘Jihadist Blowback? Syria and Lebanon.’
The Economist. p 41.
(Cartographer). (2014a). Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit
Abbott, T. (Cartographer). (2014b). Industry Innovation and
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined
Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. . London:
Brass, P. (1976). Ethnicity and Nationality Formation. Ethnicity, 3, 225-241.
Calhoun, C. (2017, 9 May 2017). Nation and Imagination How Benedict
Anderson Revolutionized Political Theory. ABC
Region and Ethics. Retrieved from www.abc.net.au/religion
Dagistanli, S., & Milivojevic, S. (2013). Appropriating the
rights of women: Moral panics, victims and exclusionary agendas in domestic and
cross-borders sex crimes. Women's Studies
International Forum, 40, 230-242. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.09.001
Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do
Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York: Routledge.
Howarth, A. (2013). A ‘superstorm’: when moral panic and new risk
discourses converge in the media. Health,
Risk & Society, 15(8), 681-698. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.851180
Johnson, C. (2002). Blowback:
The costs and consequences of American empire. London: Time Warner
Pearce, J. M., & Charman, E. (2011). A social psychological
approach to understanding moral panic. Crime,
Media, Culture, 7(3), 293-311. doi:10.1177/1741659011417607
Pinto, S., & Wardlaw, G. (1989). Political Violence. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2016). ISIS: The State of Terror. London: William Collins.